Thanks for all your suggestions.  I'm not using my favorite name  which is biblical and not often used because I would like to save it for  a future hero of my dreams, imagination and lustful thoughts.
It has to be a name that I like much, and I like strange or unusual  names, or names that are common now but weren't then.  So I chose  Zachary.  Everyone but me will call him Zach because I have a weird  dislike for nicknames.  I don't know why; it's not something I have  spent much time analyzing but obviously am now.  So I will stop.
Zachary wasn't the last man I lived with, loved or was engaged to.   While I found it easy to love again, I found it difficult to trust, and  was never sure if it was me or the man or both.
I promised myself that in writing our story I wouldn't let new  knowledge, wisdom or thoughts play a role.  Am not sure that is possible  so I might look at it from all angles.  Maybe my only true talent lies  in memory; in remembering how I felt at a certain second in time, and  why. It is a talent that I hate as pain is remembered as much or more  than happiness and in truth my life has had many more happy minutes than  painful ones.
I am doing the thing that my writing teacher tried to wipe out of me;  I am writing outside and around the story rather than diving into  details.  But in this new blogging medium I feel a certain peace and a  certain knowledge that I can work outside of so called acceptable  parameters.
Confusion races through my mind.  Why are stories supposed to be told  in a certain format?  Who set that rule?  Then explain how in one  country in one century we could have a Faulkner, Steinbeck an Updike, ,  Capote, Thomas Wolfe, Tom Wolfe, Hunter Thompson and so many others who  broke rules with gusto and love.  Yes, love for form, beauty, charm,  ugliness, detail, a million little and a thousand big things.
Words enchant me; words terrify me; words fill me with longing for  other places, other people, other lives; anything not mine.  I'm not an  adjective person yet I remember the first time I read John Updike's Rabbit Run  and was blown away by feeling that I was with Rabbit at the basketball  court.  While I'm in the state of Pennsylvania (metaphorically) and on  the subject of John's; I remember John Ohara's stories about boys  becoming men, and their mother's, younger than I am but oh so much older  and dowdier, feeding them breakfast, and not giving great doses of  wisdom.  Dorothy Parker, how could I have forgot her?  Big Blond  has always been the most perfect story to me.  Yet I'm not home, haven't  read it in years, and all I can really remember is the woman sitting at  her dressing table.  But the image of her making up and brushing her  hair has stayed transfixed and fixed in my mind forever.
Do we live in an era when everything is supposed to be homogenized,  easily digested, and from the same formula?  If that were true than why  is there room for so many different style blogs to be popular , and why do people seem hungry to read and learn from one another?
Maybe these are questions that will be laughed at by people who think that they know what makes good and/or sellable  writing; maybe they seem juvenile.  But I have spent so many years  being told how to write that I sometimes forget to focus on why I write.   I love the written word.
On this wordy note, I will end to spend tomorrow walking on the  beach, not really thinking about anything and thinking about everything  at the same time.
Then  I will find a bookstore and hope that it has some books by Will  Cather because I need a Southern woman writer fix.  Maybe it should be  Joan Didion because I am in California.  Sometimes even reading is  confusing.
Zachary didn't read many books; he was more the alt newspaper type.  But he was proud that I did.
No comments:
Post a Comment